Difference between revisions of "Anti-war"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(My own claim requires a reference, otherwise is just my POV)
(improved)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The term '''"anti-war"''' is used primarily to indicate political opposition to America's war aims, notably during the [[Vietnam War]] and the [[invasion of Iraq]]. While reminiscent of [[pacificism]], the "anti-war" movement is not opposed to war ''per se'', but only America's involvement in it.  
+
The term '''"anti-war"''' is used primarily to indicate political opposition to America's war aims, notably during the [[Vietnam War]] and the invasion of Iraq. While reminiscent of [[pacificism]], the "anti-war" movement is not opposed to war ''per se'', but only America's involvement in it.
  
−
So-called "anti-war activists" are content to let foreign governments invade other countries and slaughter or enslave innocent people, as long as the United States isn't involved.{{fact}}
+
Often overlooked by '''anti-war''' activists is that the [[American]] military is volunteer today, and service is not compulsory.
 +
 
 +
So-called "anti-war activists" are content to let foreign governments invade other countries and slaughter or enslave innocent people, as long as the United States isn't involved.
 +
[[Category:politics]]

Revision as of 14:12, April 16, 2008

The term "anti-war" is used primarily to indicate political opposition to America's war aims, notably during the Vietnam War and the invasion of Iraq. While reminiscent of pacificism, the "anti-war" movement is not opposed to war per se, but only America's involvement in it.

Often overlooked by anti-war activists is that the American military is volunteer today, and service is not compulsory.

So-called "anti-war activists" are content to let foreign governments invade other countries and slaughter or enslave innocent people, as long as the United States isn't involved.