Difference between revisions of "Talk:Starvation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(yea) |
(sources) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Isn't that source a little iffy? If we cannot accept about.com, then why should we accept answers.yahoo.com which is highly based on user contribution (like Wikipedia)? o_0 [[User:Kektklik|Fuzzy|AFD]] 15:19, 18 April 2008 (EDT) | Isn't that source a little iffy? If we cannot accept about.com, then why should we accept answers.yahoo.com which is highly based on user contribution (like Wikipedia)? o_0 [[User:Kektklik|Fuzzy|AFD]] 15:19, 18 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
:I'm inclined to agree with you there Fuzzy. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 15:34, 18 April 2008 (EDT) | :I'm inclined to agree with you there Fuzzy. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 15:34, 18 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I thought it was better than no reference at all. Your choices at this point are to delete the information, or to find a better source. Take your pick. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:37, 18 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:37, April 18, 2008
Reference source
Isn't that source a little iffy? If we cannot accept about.com, then why should we accept answers.yahoo.com which is highly based on user contribution (like Wikipedia)? o_0 Fuzzy|AFD 15:19, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
- I'm inclined to agree with you there Fuzzy. BrianCo 15:34, 18 April 2008 (EDT)