Difference between revisions of "Graham v. Connor"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: In '' Graham v. Connor'', 490 U.S. 386, 396 (1989), the U.S. Supreme Court held that "Fourth Amendment jurisprudence has long recognized that the right to make an arrest or investi...) |
FernoKlump (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In '' Graham v. Connor'', 490 U.S. 386, 396 (1989), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that "[[Fourth Amendment]] jurisprudence has long recognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion or threat thereof to effect it." | + | In '' '''Graham v. Connor''''', 490 U.S. 386, 396 (1989), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that "[[Fourth Amendment]] jurisprudence has long recognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion or threat thereof to effect it." |
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
[[category:Fourth Amendment]] | [[category:Fourth Amendment]] | ||
Revision as of 04:49, May 1, 2008
In Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 396 (1989), the U.S. Supreme Court held that "Fourth Amendment jurisprudence has long recognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion or threat thereof to effect it."