Difference between revisions of "User talk:Colbertnation2"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Gee, they even got [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Atomic_resolution_Au100.JPG pictures of em] for those that can't read. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 19:36, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
 
Gee, they even got [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Atomic_resolution_Au100.JPG pictures of em] for those that can't read. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 19:36, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
 
:That's a bunch of squiggly lines, what are you trying to pull?--[[User:Colbertnation2|Colbertnation2]] 19:36, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
 
:That's a bunch of squiggly lines, what are you trying to pull?--[[User:Colbertnation2|Colbertnation2]] 19:36, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
:Also, I don't know if anyone told you this, but Wikipedia is frowned upon here. They have a steeply liberal and anti-Christian bias. You linked to an image that discretes a literal Genesis, further proving my point.--[[User:Colbertnation2|Colbertnation2]] 19:46, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
+
:Also, I don't know if anyone told you this, but Wikipedia is frowned upon here. They have a steeply liberal and anti-Christian bias. You linked to an image that discredits a literal Genesis, further proving my point.--[[User:Colbertnation2|Colbertnation2]] 19:46, 3 May 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:47, May 3, 2008

Proven phenomena

Gee, they even got pictures of em for those that can't read. 10px Fox (talk|contribs) 19:36, 3 May 2008 (EDT)

That's a bunch of squiggly lines, what are you trying to pull?--Colbertnation2 19:36, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
Also, I don't know if anyone told you this, but Wikipedia is frowned upon here. They have a steeply liberal and anti-Christian bias. You linked to an image that discredits a literal Genesis, further proving my point.--Colbertnation2 19:46, 3 May 2008 (EDT)