Difference between revisions of "User talk:Colbertnation2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
Ultimahero (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:That's a bunch of squiggly lines, what are you trying to pull?--[[User:Colbertnation2|Colbertnation2]] 19:36, 3 May 2008 (EDT) | :That's a bunch of squiggly lines, what are you trying to pull?--[[User:Colbertnation2|Colbertnation2]] 19:36, 3 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Also, I don't know if anyone told you this, but Wikipedia is frowned upon here. They have a steeply liberal and anti-Christian bias. You linked to an image that discredits a literal Genesis, further proving my point.--[[User:Colbertnation2|Colbertnation2]] 19:46, 3 May 2008 (EDT) | :Also, I don't know if anyone told you this, but Wikipedia is frowned upon here. They have a steeply liberal and anti-Christian bias. You linked to an image that discredits a literal Genesis, further proving my point.--[[User:Colbertnation2|Colbertnation2]] 19:46, 3 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hey. With all do respect, I don't edit your main page, so please don't edit mine. If you want to talk to me, do so on the talk page. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 19:49, 3 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:49, May 3, 2008
Proven phenomena
Gee, they even got pictures of em for those that can't read. 10px Fox (talk|contribs) 19:36, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
- That's a bunch of squiggly lines, what are you trying to pull?--Colbertnation2 19:36, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
- Also, I don't know if anyone told you this, but Wikipedia is frowned upon here. They have a steeply liberal and anti-Christian bias. You linked to an image that discredits a literal Genesis, further proving my point.--Colbertnation2 19:46, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
Hey. With all do respect, I don't edit your main page, so please don't edit mine. If you want to talk to me, do so on the talk page. Ultimahero 19:49, 3 May 2008 (EDT)