Difference between revisions of "NEA v. Finley"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(moved cat) |
m (bold) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In ''NEA v. Finley'', 524 U.S. 569, 587-588 (1998), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that government is permitted to "allocate funding according to criteria that would be impermissible were direct regulation of speech or a criminal penalty at stake." | + | In '''''NEA v. Finley''''', 524 U.S. 569, 587-588 (1998), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that government is permitted to "allocate funding according to criteria that would be impermissible were direct regulation of speech or a criminal penalty at stake." |
The Court upheld anti-pornographic restrictions on governmental funding of the arts. | The Court upheld anti-pornographic restrictions on governmental funding of the arts. | ||
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
Revision as of 16:25, May 4, 2008
In NEA v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569, 587-588 (1998), the U.S. Supreme Court held that government is permitted to "allocate funding according to criteria that would be impermissible were direct regulation of speech or a criminal penalty at stake."
The Court upheld anti-pornographic restrictions on governmental funding of the arts.