Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mathematics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: This is great, conservapedia has half a page about mathematics, whereas wikipedia has dozens upon dozens of pages devoted to various fields of mathematics. I'm glad to see that conservaped...) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is great, conservapedia has half a page about mathematics, whereas wikipedia has dozens upon dozens of pages devoted to various fields of mathematics. I'm glad to see that conservapedia has no interest what-so-ever in mathematics, a true testiment to the intelligence of this fine, fine website. | This is great, conservapedia has half a page about mathematics, whereas wikipedia has dozens upon dozens of pages devoted to various fields of mathematics. I'm glad to see that conservapedia has no interest what-so-ever in mathematics, a true testiment to the intelligence of this fine, fine website. | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Dude, you misspelled "testament". Try improving yourself first and then you might be in a position to criticize others. | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Unlike Wikipedia, Conservapedia does not take the childish approach of "more words is better." We strive to be concise as a good encyclopedia should. Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:57, 24 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:57, May 25, 2008
This is great, conservapedia has half a page about mathematics, whereas wikipedia has dozens upon dozens of pages devoted to various fields of mathematics. I'm glad to see that conservapedia has no interest what-so-ever in mathematics, a true testiment to the intelligence of this fine, fine website.
- Dude, you misspelled "testament". Try improving yourself first and then you might be in a position to criticize others.
- Unlike Wikipedia, Conservapedia does not take the childish approach of "more words is better." We strive to be concise as a good encyclopedia should. Godspeed.--Aschlafly 21:57, 24 May 2008 (EDT)