Difference between revisions of "Martin v. Commonwealth"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: In ''Martin v. Commonwealth'', 184 Va. 1009, 1018-1019, 37 S. E. 2d 43, 47 (1946), the Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed a conviction of murder against a wife who had shot her [[husba...) |
m (bold) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In ''Martin v. Commonwealth'', 184 Va. 1009, 1018-1019, 37 S. E. 2d 43, 47 (1946), the Supreme Court of [[Virginia]] affirmed a conviction of murder against a wife who had shot her [[husband]] at his request. The Court stated that: | + | In '''''Martin v. Commonwealth''''', 184 Va. 1009, 1018-1019, 37 S. E. 2d 43, 47 (1946), the Supreme Court of [[Virginia]] affirmed a conviction of murder against a wife who had shot her [[husband]] at his request. The Court stated that: |
:"'The right to life and to personal security is not only sacred in the estimation of the common law, but it is inalienable.'" | :"'The right to life and to personal security is not only sacred in the estimation of the common law, but it is inalienable.'" | ||
The decision is significant in demonstrating that the [[common law]] defended the sanctity of life. | The decision is significant in demonstrating that the [[common law]] defended the sanctity of life. | ||
| + | |||
[[category:State Court Cases]] | [[category:State Court Cases]] | ||
Revision as of 16:02, June 2, 2008
In Martin v. Commonwealth, 184 Va. 1009, 1018-1019, 37 S. E. 2d 43, 47 (1946), the Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed a conviction of murder against a wife who had shot her husband at his request. The Court stated that:
- "'The right to life and to personal security is not only sacred in the estimation of the common law, but it is inalienable.'"
The decision is significant in demonstrating that the common law defended the sanctity of life.