Difference between revisions of "Talk:Final Fantasy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (I'm cranky and tired...) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
"Created by vandal"... worst excuse ever. Deleted a factual page because other contributions were of the dirt? +_+ <sub>always tired</sub> [[User:Kektklik|Kektk]] 22:40, 4 June 2008 (EDT) | "Created by vandal"... worst excuse ever. Deleted a factual page because other contributions were of the dirt? +_+ <sub>always tired</sub> [[User:Kektklik|Kektk]] 22:40, 4 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :The page was not factual and it was created hundreds of times by numerous socks. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 22:47, 4 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:47, June 5, 2008
Why was this page deleted Eljawa 09:26, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
- It might be possible to start over with a God-centered critique, similar to what we have done with Grand Theft Auto. --Ed Poor Talk 08:41, 4 April 2008 (EDT)
- One objection to this game is an underlying message that duty and obedience to the law are bad things. [1]
Yes, I'm second to that, but we should add warning like:"this game might contain the word of magic or info of witchcraft". And thanks info about FF9, it brought good times. --TagoPagdaluhong 09:08, 4 April 2008 (EDT)
"Created by vandal"... worst excuse ever. Deleted a factual page because other contributions were of the dirt? +_+ always tired Kektk 22:40, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
- The page was not factual and it was created hundreds of times by numerous socks. HenryS 22:47, 4 June 2008 (EDT)