Difference between revisions of "Talk:U.S. History Textbook Project"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reply)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Not to seem rude, but this whole "[insert item here] has a Liberal bias!" Is getting a little bit absurd. Now, I really can understand some of the things people are accusing of having "bias" (Media Outlets primarily) But now this whole "textbook conspiracy" seems a little bit absurd to me.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:03, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Not to seem rude, but this whole "[insert item here] has a Liberal bias!" Is getting a little bit absurd. Now, I really can understand some of the things people are accusing of having "bias" (Media Outlets primarily) But now this whole "textbook conspiracy" seems a little bit absurd to me.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:03, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Oh right - the media has liberal bias but somehow textbooks do not.  What's their secret???  Perhaps you're next going to tell us that Wikipedia does not have any bias either.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:31, 11 June 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 02:31, June 12, 2008

I read Churchill's 'The Great Republic' when I was in college. Highly reccomend it as something of a 'conservative' viewpoint.

However, stick to the textbooks for examinations. Textbooks merely provide facts in a dry form. You are pulling at straws if you can find any sort of Liberal bias in them. TBarret 10:05, 11 June 2008 (EDT)

Not to seem rude, but this whole "[insert item here] has a Liberal bias!" Is getting a little bit absurd. Now, I really can understand some of the things people are accusing of having "bias" (Media Outlets primarily) But now this whole "textbook conspiracy" seems a little bit absurd to me.--ITSAMEMARIO 22:03, 11 June 2008 (EDT)

Oh right - the media has liberal bias but somehow textbooks do not. What's their secret??? Perhaps you're next going to tell us that Wikipedia does not have any bias either.--Aschlafly 22:31, 11 June 2008 (EDT)