Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kimveer Gill"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Does anyone else think that this person doesn't really seem to be notable enough to warrant their own entry in an encyclopedia? ~~~~) |
(Terrorist) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does anyone else think that this person doesn't really seem to be notable enough to warrant their own entry in an encyclopedia? [[User:Sulgran|Sulgran]] 23:40, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | Does anyone else think that this person doesn't really seem to be notable enough to warrant their own entry in an encyclopedia? [[User:Sulgran|Sulgran]] 23:40, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Terrorist == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Gill was a lot of things - a murderer, a criminal, a scumbag - but his shooting spree was not politically motivated, and thus, given CPs own definition of terrorism (as well as any reasonable definition of the word) he was not a "terrorist." [[User:AliceBG|AliceBG]] 12:05, 12 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:05, June 12, 2008
Does anyone else think that this person doesn't really seem to be notable enough to warrant their own entry in an encyclopedia? Sulgran 23:40, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
Terrorist
Gill was a lot of things - a murderer, a criminal, a scumbag - but his shooting spree was not politically motivated, and thus, given CPs own definition of terrorism (as well as any reasonable definition of the word) he was not a "terrorist." AliceBG 12:05, 12 June 2008 (EDT)