Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:AFD Major bias in conservapedia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ==Major bias in conservapedia== Being self-aware of a site's problems can be useful... Examples at Wikipedia include [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_failing Wikip...) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 14:08, March 19, 2007
Major bias in conservapedia
Being self-aware of a site's problems can be useful... Examples at Wikipedia include Wikipedia:Wikipedia is failing and Wikipedia:Problems with Wikipedia. However, those stuck around because they offer some constructive criticism, and are written as a cohesive summary by very experienced users who understand some of Wikipedia's broader, more subtle problems.
This page, however, is likely to become a drive-by troll magnet for people who are new to the site. Moreover, most locked pages have an unlocked talk page where specific concerns can be addressed, and, failing that, User talk:Aschlafly seems to be a popular place to list complaints. --Interiot 10:08, 19 March 2007 (EDT)