Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chemistry"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Drcody (Talk); changed back to last version by Philip J. Rayment) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Perhaps you could have a go at it? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:58, 5 July 2007 (EDT) | :Perhaps you could have a go at it? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:58, 5 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Well, I'm going to give this a shot... feel free to helf, I'll do some editing when I get a chance.--[[User:Davejac|Davejac]] 22:38, 29 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:38, June 30, 2008
There are MANY more branches other than organic, physical, and "general", which isn't even a field of chemistry. It appears that someone opened up a college course book and picked the only courses that contained one adjective. What about inorganic chemistry (which deserves the definition given to general), analytical chemistry, or biochemistry. Also, physical is not a sub group, subgroups are ones such as bioanalytical chemistry or physical organic or physical inorganic etc. PLEASE someone do this article justice. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DrCody (talk)
- Perhaps you could have a go at it? Philip J. Rayment 07:58, 5 July 2007 (EDT)
Well, I'm going to give this a shot... feel free to helf, I'll do some editing when I get a chance.--Davejac 22:38, 29 June 2008 (EDT)