Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gertrude Stein"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
While the (now removed) linked page is somewhat... ''graphic'' in its descriptions, the author has a point. Aside from the random italics and blockquotes, the fact that a Conservapedia sysop used a Holocaust Denial site as reference for a biography is extremely troubling. An explanation would be appreciated. --[[User:KevinM|KevinM]] 16:12, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 
While the (now removed) linked page is somewhat... ''graphic'' in its descriptions, the author has a point. Aside from the random italics and blockquotes, the fact that a Conservapedia sysop used a Holocaust Denial site as reference for a biography is extremely troubling. An explanation would be appreciated. --[[User:KevinM|KevinM]] 16:12, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 +
:It was most likely a mistake, the result of a random google search. But you are certainly right, it should have been removed immediately. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:27, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:27, July 1, 2008

While the (now removed) linked page is somewhat... graphic in its descriptions, the author has a point. Aside from the random italics and blockquotes, the fact that a Conservapedia sysop used a Holocaust Denial site as reference for a biography is extremely troubling. An explanation would be appreciated. --KevinM 16:12, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

It was most likely a mistake, the result of a random google search. But you are certainly right, it should have been removed immediately. HenryS 19:27, 1 July 2008 (EDT)