Difference between revisions of "Talk:Partial birth abortion"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
: You deleted a federal statute!  I restored it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:36, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
 
: You deleted a federal statute!  I restored it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:36, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Title==
 +
 +
I think that this article should be titled "Intact dilation and extraction. That is the medical term and no medical textbook has the term "partial birth abortion. It is a political term thought up by an anti-abortion politician and has no scientific merit and is only referred to as 'partial birth abortion' in the United States.
 +
I would restructure it to read " Intact dilation and extraction (IDX or intact D&X), also known in the United States as partial birth abortion...".
 +
 +
--[[User:emmagrrrl]]

Revision as of 04:56, July 8, 2008

I removed the biased parts :D Please attempt to use neutral sites and not completely right wing or completely left wing sites. It makes the articles more reliable AtheistKathryn 01:15, 4 May 2007 (EDT)

You deleted a federal statute! I restored it.--Aschlafly 01:36, 4 May 2007 (EDT)

Title

I think that this article should be titled "Intact dilation and extraction. That is the medical term and no medical textbook has the term "partial birth abortion. It is a political term thought up by an anti-abortion politician and has no scientific merit and is only referred to as 'partial birth abortion' in the United States. I would restructure it to read " Intact dilation and extraction (IDX or intact D&X), also known in the United States as partial birth abortion...".

--User:emmagrrrl