Difference between revisions of "Template talk:User biblemetaphor"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(requesting clarification) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not that I am going to use this userbox, but perhaps better wording would be "historical account" rather than "history book"? And does this template just refer to [[Genesis]], the [[Old Testament]], or to all of [[The Bible]]? Because I don't think there's much dispute that [[Jesus]] existed... -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 14:54, 18 July 2008 (EDT) | Not that I am going to use this userbox, but perhaps better wording would be "historical account" rather than "history book"? And does this template just refer to [[Genesis]], the [[Old Testament]], or to all of [[The Bible]]? Because I don't think there's much dispute that [[Jesus]] existed... -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 14:54, 18 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I prefer "history book" because it is obviously a book, and I just think the way it is read is as if it were a history book. But that' merely a semantical point. And while Jesus existed, his actions (read: miracles) are open to interpretation. --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 14:57, 18 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:57, July 18, 2008
Not that I am going to use this userbox, but perhaps better wording would be "historical account" rather than "history book"? And does this template just refer to Genesis, the Old Testament, or to all of The Bible? Because I don't think there's much dispute that Jesus existed... -Foxtrot 14:54, 18 July 2008 (EDT)
- I prefer "history book" because it is obviously a book, and I just think the way it is read is as if it were a history book. But that' merely a semantical point. And while Jesus existed, his actions (read: miracles) are open to interpretation. --Jareddr 14:57, 18 July 2008 (EDT)