Changes

Line 42: Line 42:     
::Ymmotrojam, if you want to be constructive you will forget this silly article all together.  As has been pointed out it is just a straw man argument.  If you want to debate creation and evolution I would applaud that.  What you have chosen to do, however, is indulge in what is effectively a name-calling exercise.  This article is not a serious entry in an encyclopedic work.  It's a piece of cheap propaganda.  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 19:34, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::Ymmotrojam, if you want to be constructive you will forget this silly article all together.  As has been pointed out it is just a straw man argument.  If you want to debate creation and evolution I would applaud that.  What you have chosen to do, however, is indulge in what is effectively a name-calling exercise.  This article is not a serious entry in an encyclopedic work.  It's a piece of cheap propaganda.  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 19:34, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::I again go back to the fact that I did not create the term, and I am continuing to source my claims. Also note that it's a draft (''preliminary version of a written work''). This doesn't have to be, nor do I desire it to be the finished product as it is now. Lets work together on it. It is definitely encyclopedic material. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 19:42, 19 March 2007 (EDT)