Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 44: Line 44:     
:::I again go back to the fact that I did not create the term, and I am continuing to source my claims. Also note that it's a draft (''preliminary version of a written work''). This doesn't have to be, nor do I desire it to be the finished product as it is now. Lets work together on it. It is definitely encyclopedic material. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 19:42, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::I again go back to the fact that I did not create the term, and I am continuing to source my claims. Also note that it's a draft (''preliminary version of a written work''). This doesn't have to be, nor do I desire it to be the finished product as it is now. Lets work together on it. It is definitely encyclopedic material. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 19:42, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::...no, it's not. Your sources all have the agenda of making science (and thus evolution) look less credible. Find me a few notable, reliable, ''non-creationist'' sources that support your claim.
 +
::::I can find sources that "prove" that the Holocaust never happened and that Adolf Hitler should have received the Nobel Peace Prize, but that doesn't mean that I can create an article called "The Holocaust never happened!" However, I could create an article about Holocaust Denial. Just like this should be an article about how Creationists try to assert something about evolutionists. Nothing more. You mistake propaganda for facts. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:50, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
1,767

edits

Navigation menu