1,161
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 47:
Line 47: + +
→Gravitationism, Electricityism, Wheelism: comment - be back on tommorrow. studying
::::...no, it's not. Your sources all have the agenda of making science (and thus evolution) look less credible. Find me a few notable, reliable, ''non-creationist'' sources that support your claim.
::::...no, it's not. Your sources all have the agenda of making science (and thus evolution) look less credible. Find me a few notable, reliable, ''non-creationist'' sources that support your claim.
::::I can find sources that "prove" that the Holocaust never happened and that Adolf Hitler should have received the Nobel Peace Prize, but that doesn't mean that I can create an article called "The Holocaust never happened!" However, I could create an article about Holocaust Denial. Just like this should be an article about how Creationists try to assert something about evolutionists. Nothing more. You mistake propaganda for facts. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:50, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
::::I can find sources that "prove" that the Holocaust never happened and that Adolf Hitler should have received the Nobel Peace Prize, but that doesn't mean that I can create an article called "The Holocaust never happened!" However, I could create an article about Holocaust Denial. Just like this should be an article about how Creationists try to assert something about evolutionists. Nothing more. You mistake propaganda for facts. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:50, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
:::::You're on very dangerous intellectual ground to not accept any sources from an opponent. Sounds almost elitist. If you've got sources and counter arguments you would like to add, be my guest. If it's a good position, one will win out over the other. That's just the nature of how things work when both sides are presented. You shouldn't be so afraid if you're so sure of yourself.<br />"Your sources all have the agenda of making science...look less credible."<br />That's an completely unfounded claim. There whole point is to protect the distortion of science by the evolutionary theory. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 20:06, 19 March 2007 (EDT)