Difference between revisions of "Talk:Overcoming homosexuality"
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:Judging by the incredibly ignorant views on them, I would say no. [[User: Kiss20|Kiss20]] 22:51, 12 December 2007 | :Judging by the incredibly ignorant views on them, I would say no. [[User: Kiss20|Kiss20]] 22:51, 12 December 2007 | ||
| + | ::He doesn't want to risk contracting the Gay. It's contagious right?[[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 14:06, 28 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:06, August 28, 2008
"Today people still report leaving homosexuality and becoming heterosexuals through their Christian faith."
I propose changing the wording to reflect the idea that some ex-homosexuals simply become sexually inactive, or effectively asexual. DanH 00:24, 30 November 2007 (EST)
Also, has anyone left homosexuality due to another faith? Islam, for instance? They have some pretty harsh anti-homosexual laws.Maestro 01:11, 30 November 2007 (EST)
- Well, the President of Iran claims there are no homosexuals in his country, so apparently it has occurred. ;-) Learn together 01:28, 30 November 2007 (EST)
- That's because they all get lynched. But then that's their own fault for being homosexual isn't it. Jros83 14:05, 28 August 2008 (EDT)
The Apostle Paul says that celibacy is no better nor worse than marriage, so it should be clear that lifelong celibacy is an option. DanH 12:24, 30 November 2007 (EST)
Dissenting views
The point I made wasn't unreasonable. I thought the whole idea of a free form wiki that everyone can edit is that one person doesn't claim ownership of articles. I say this from experience in Wikipedia (Which I have left) and Citizendium. MarcusCicero 22:07, 10 December 2007 (EST)
Mr.Conservative, have you ever met a Homosexual? Just curious. Reasonableperson 18:38, 11 December 2007 (EST)