Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ontological argument"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: The argument assumes that something has to meet the definition of god. otherwise the conclusion would not follow. --~~~~) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Wikiproject Religion}} | ||
| + | |||
The argument assumes that something has to meet the definition of god. otherwise the conclusion would not follow. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim <small>(CPAdmin1)</small>]]<sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> 12:37, 21 August 2007 (EDT) | The argument assumes that something has to meet the definition of god. otherwise the conclusion would not follow. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim <small>(CPAdmin1)</small>]]<sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> 12:37, 21 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:22, September 1, 2008
| ! | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Religion-related articles on Conservapedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | 
|
The argument assumes that something has to meet the definition of god. otherwise the conclusion would not follow. --Tim (CPAdmin1)talk 12:37, 21 August 2007 (EDT)