Changes

647 bytes added ,  18:37, September 11, 2008
Line 61: Line 61:  
::If you feel strongly that the tuition should be mentioned in the body of the article, do you feel we should also list the tuition of the University of Delaware, Syracuse University College of Law, and perhaps even Widener and Del Tech?  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:16, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
 
::If you feel strongly that the tuition should be mentioned in the body of the article, do you feel we should also list the tuition of the University of Delaware, Syracuse University College of Law, and perhaps even Widener and Del Tech?  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:16, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
    +
:::Biden has been touting his blue collar roots for over 2 decades - the crux of his plagarized speech in 2008.  A financial needs scholarship would be the perfect addition to his story.  We are not going to assume a sudden ongoing bashfulness on his part in that area.  Further education when one is an adult doesn't carry the same meaning as childhood dependence.  Trying to equate costs for college as an ongoing part of that story, or to water down the aspect of parents paying for a private school for their son, would not be a beneficial contribution to the article. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 14:37, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
 
 
:Furthermore, his "admitting" his plagarism ignores the fact he did so only after he was caught and had no other choice.  One can not accidentally copy enmasse a work from another person and not have it be understood to be plagarism. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:56, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:Furthermore, his "admitting" his plagarism ignores the fact he did so only after he was caught and had no other choice.  One can not accidentally copy enmasse a work from another person and not have it be understood to be plagarism. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:56, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
    
:: As I said above, I have no opinion as to the ''content'' of the plagiarism sentences.  But one of them isn't even a proper sentence, and the other is poorly written.  If you don't like my version, that's OK with me; it was just an attempt to correct the grammar, not to change the content.  But could you pretty please fix it to be grammatically correct?  Thanks. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:16, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:: As I said above, I have no opinion as to the ''content'' of the plagiarism sentences.  But one of them isn't even a proper sentence, and the other is poorly written.  If you don't like my version, that's OK with me; it was just an attempt to correct the grammar, not to change the content.  But could you pretty please fix it to be grammatically correct?  Thanks. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:16, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits