Difference between revisions of "Talk:Exotheology"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→removed stupid uncited ref "the Bible to be inaccurate": clarify heading) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
What was stupid about it? As for it being unreferenced, the reference at the end of that sentence has the bloke saying, "Fr Funes ... said ... that the Bible should not be held to account for its lack of scientific accuracy." If he says that it has a lack of scientific accuracy, he is saying that it is ''inaccurate'' (in areas that science says differently). That bit should be reinstated. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 17:22, 11 September 2008 (EDT) | What was stupid about it? As for it being unreferenced, the reference at the end of that sentence has the bloke saying, "Fr Funes ... said ... that the Bible should not be held to account for its lack of scientific accuracy." If he says that it has a lack of scientific accuracy, he is saying that it is ''inaccurate'' (in areas that science says differently). That bit should be reinstated. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 17:22, 11 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Sorry I took offense. He was not saying that he believed the bible was inaccurate, just in regards to science. You can reworded the phrase. The bible is inaccurate to explain science, It just sounded like the Rev doesn't believe in the bible, which he does. Bloke? Are you from down under? My apologies. --[[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 17:35, 11 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:35, September 11, 2008
| ! | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Religion-related articles on Conservapedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | 
|
Edit comment: 'removed stupid uncited ref "the Bible to be inaccurate" '
What was stupid about it? As for it being unreferenced, the reference at the end of that sentence has the bloke saying, "Fr Funes ... said ... that the Bible should not be held to account for its lack of scientific accuracy." If he says that it has a lack of scientific accuracy, he is saying that it is inaccurate (in areas that science says differently). That bit should be reinstated. Philip J. Rayment 17:22, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
- Sorry I took offense. He was not saying that he believed the bible was inaccurate, just in regards to science. You can reworded the phrase. The bible is inaccurate to explain science, It just sounded like the Rev doesn't believe in the bible, which he does. Bloke? Are you from down under? My apologies. --
jp 17:35, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
