Difference between revisions of "Talk:Comprehension gap"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Is the abortion example really necessary? It's somewhat convoluted and comes off more as another venue to speak against abortion than as a clear example of a comprehension gap. ~~~~) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is the abortion example really necessary? It's somewhat convoluted and comes off more as another venue to speak against abortion than as a clear example of a comprehension gap. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:07, 18 September 2008 (EDT) | Is the abortion example really necessary? It's somewhat convoluted and comes off more as another venue to speak against abortion than as a clear example of a comprehension gap. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:07, 18 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | If it doesn't fit well, replace with a better example. Personally, I thought the use in the sentence was weaker. You removed the disclaimer and the category, fine.--[[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 15:27, 18 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:27, September 18, 2008
Is the abortion example really necessary? It's somewhat convoluted and comes off more as another venue to speak against abortion than as a clear example of a comprehension gap. HelpJazz 14:07, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
If it doesn't fit well, replace with a better example. Personally, I thought the use in the sentence was weaker. You removed the disclaimer and the category, fine.--
jp 15:27, 18 September 2008 (EDT)