Difference between revisions of "User talk:RJJensen"
(thanks) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Welcome indeed to CP! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 19:18, 10 September 2008 (EDT) | Welcome indeed to CP! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 19:18, 10 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
::hey thanks! [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 19:25, 10 September 2008 (EDT) | ::hey thanks! [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 19:25, 10 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==China== | ||
| + | Chinese history would appear not to be your forte. How describing the fluctuating state of authority in the warlord period counts as 'red propaganda', I am at a loss to understand. Please don't cause damage to other Chinese history articles. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 07:03, 20 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:03, September 20, 2008
Welcome!
Hello, RJJensen, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, RJJensen!
Bugler 17:49, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
Thanks for your fascinating addition to Barack Obama re: financing. Godspeed.--Aschlafly 18:26, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Welcome
Welcome indeed to CP! --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 19:18, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
- hey thanks! RJJensen 19:25, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
China
Chinese history would appear not to be your forte. How describing the fluctuating state of authority in the warlord period counts as 'red propaganda', I am at a loss to understand. Please don't cause damage to other Chinese history articles. Bugler 07:03, 20 September 2008 (EDT)