Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Proposed Homeschool Constitution"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(good idea)
(reply)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
: Seems like a good idea.  Would you consider drawing up an alternate Constitution for Jewish, Moslem or other non-Judeo-Christian children?  I'm sure they could do with a 'system' for their own schools.    And yes, the point above about Liberal bias is fair - there would probably have to be a Constitution for them too.  [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 13:26, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 
: Seems like a good idea.  Would you consider drawing up an alternate Constitution for Jewish, Moslem or other non-Judeo-Christian children?  I'm sure they could do with a 'system' for their own schools.    And yes, the point above about Liberal bias is fair - there would probably have to be a Constitution for them too.  [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 13:26, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: Many "non-Judeo-Christian children" may want to adopt this Constitution, or participate in classes.  It's common to find non-Christian students attending Christian schools, for example.  That's no reason to change the school or the Constitution.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:28, 21 September 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:28, September 21, 2008

Liberal bias is mentioned twice. I suggest to make it more neutral and to keep in mind those Liberals who want to homeschool their children. --BillC 13:22, 21 September 2008 (EDT)

Seems like a good idea. Would you consider drawing up an alternate Constitution for Jewish, Moslem or other non-Judeo-Christian children? I'm sure they could do with a 'system' for their own schools. And yes, the point above about Liberal bias is fair - there would probably have to be a Constitution for them too. BenHur 13:26, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
Many "non-Judeo-Christian children" may want to adopt this Constitution, or participate in classes. It's common to find non-Christian students attending Christian schools, for example. That's no reason to change the school or the Constitution.--Aschlafly 13:28, 21 September 2008 (EDT)