Changes

Talk:American History Lecture Four (view source)

Revision as of 23:32, September 29, 2008

523 bytes added , 23:32, September 29, 2008

→‎Marshall Court: Agree on Principle, Disagree on Specifics: replied

Line 16: Line 16:

I'd be happy to add information to the Marbury section if you'd like. The history behind it is really quite fascinating, as you no doubt know.-[[User:CMarius|CMarius]]

+

: CMarius, thanks for your insights. I welcome your contributions, and I don't disagree with your comments above. Marbury is not very objectionable. However, I think the pattern of Marshall's decisions, and their aggressiveness at establishing federal power (particularly power by the federal judiciary), are objectionable. And his tenure of 35 years? If 8 years was enough for George Washington, I don't see how Marshall justified being in charge for 35.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:32, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,597

edits