Difference between revisions of "Talk:Obama syndrome"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Bad wording?: new section) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Bad wording? == | == Bad wording? == | ||
| − | This article gives the impression of Conservapedia trying to defend Obama. Should | + | This article gives the impression of Conservapedia trying to defend Obama. Should "editors" be changed to "vandals" or "enemies of the project" or something? --[[User:Devout|Devout]] 14:06, 30 September 2008 (EDT) |
Revision as of 18:06, September 30, 2008
I wonder, if they like Obama regardless of his stance, then why do they like him? HelpJazz 13:12, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
- Because he is a well spoken fellow with nice teeth. And that is what interests the voting public. Sideways 13:32, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
- Can anyone provide any actual proof of this or is this just another "just for fun" posts? NateE Let Us Communicate 13:36, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
Bad wording?
This article gives the impression of Conservapedia trying to defend Obama. Should "editors" be changed to "vandals" or "enemies of the project" or something? --Devout 14:06, 30 September 2008 (EDT)