Difference between revisions of "Talk:Answers in Genesis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ymmotrojam (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) (Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or teach both sides) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Yes we should use it! And of course it is biased - it has a conservative Christian bias! {{unsigned|Smile}} | :Yes we should use it! And of course it is biased - it has a conservative Christian bias! {{unsigned|Smile}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or teach both sides == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or teach both positions? Is the article correct? There is no citation. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:04, 20 March 2007 (EDT)conservative | ||
Revision as of 03:04, March 21, 2007
I think we all need to agree that AiG doesn't count as a valid source to cite for Conservapedia. Having read through its site pretty thoroughly, I can say that it's an extremely biased and opinionated organization with little to no actual scientific value.-AmesG 22:45, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- Yes we should use it! And of course it is biased - it has a conservative Christian bias! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smile (talk)
Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or teach both sides
Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or teach both positions? Is the article correct? There is no citation. Conservative 23:04, 20 March 2007 (EDT)conservative