Changes

491 bytes added ,  00:01, October 12, 2008
→‎Paragraph quote: BrianCo - I agree.
Line 165: Line 165:  
::My personal view is that cquote should only be used to draw special attention to a particular quote rather than encapsulate a whole article. It tends to be overused in a lot of articles and to my mind makes the page look ugly. Normal quotes are fine in the vast majority of cases. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 17:09, 11 October 2008 (EDT)
 
::My personal view is that cquote should only be used to draw special attention to a particular quote rather than encapsulate a whole article. It tends to be overused in a lot of articles and to my mind makes the page look ugly. Normal quotes are fine in the vast majority of cases. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 17:09, 11 October 2008 (EDT)
 
:::Maybe we should for this to be addressed in the "Manual of Style"?  [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 17:16, 11 October 2008 (EDT)
 
:::Maybe we should for this to be addressed in the "Manual of Style"?  [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 17:16, 11 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
:::BrianCo - I agree that a quote of a sentence or two doesn't need the fancy style of the cquote markup.  Like you said, normal quotes are fine in the vast majority of cases.  Longer quotations should of course be used sparingly; in my opinion only when they are really significant, in which case the cquote markup would be OK, I think.  Certainly it should be the rare case that an entire article would be a quote from a single source!  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:01, 11 October 2008 (EDT)
1,837

edits