Difference between revisions of "Talk:Non-believer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't see what was wrong with my edit. "No its not" doesn't really tell me what the problem was, and I was trying to find a middle ground so we still keep the primary religious definition while also allowing for non-belief in other things. ----[[User:ToJones|ToJones]] 19:23, 19 October 2008 (EDT) | I don't see what was wrong with my edit. "No its not" doesn't really tell me what the problem was, and I was trying to find a middle ground so we still keep the primary religious definition while also allowing for non-belief in other things. ----[[User:ToJones|ToJones]] 19:23, 19 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Oh man, I thought you added that statement. I meant to remove it entirely, sorry. There are other reasons to come to disbelief besides "not knowing any better" and "irrationally refusing to accept", as the statement applies. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:41, 19 October 2008 (EDT) | :Oh man, I thought you added that statement. I meant to remove it entirely, sorry. There are other reasons to come to disbelief besides "not knowing any better" and "irrationally refusing to accept", as the statement applies. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:41, 19 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Oh ok. I agree with you, but that clause kept getting reverted so I wanted to find some middle ground. No hard feelings. ----[[User:ToJones|ToJones]] 19:43, 19 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:43, October 19, 2008
I don't see what was wrong with my edit. "No its not" doesn't really tell me what the problem was, and I was trying to find a middle ground so we still keep the primary religious definition while also allowing for non-belief in other things. ----ToJones 19:23, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
- Oh man, I thought you added that statement. I meant to remove it entirely, sorry. There are other reasons to come to disbelief besides "not knowing any better" and "irrationally refusing to accept", as the statement applies. HelpJazz 19:41, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
- Oh ok. I agree with you, but that clause kept getting reverted so I wanted to find some middle ground. No hard feelings. ----ToJones 19:43, 19 October 2008 (EDT)