nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 287:
Line 287: +
Talk:Young Earth Creationism (view source)
Revision as of 02:34, October 22, 2008
, 02:34, October 22, 2008→Reactions to Criticism, Really?: Your response is a series of opinions stated as fact.
There are definitely problems with the term "bogus". The Reactions to Criticism section states the evolutionist argument against YEC as questionable the poses the YEC rebuttal as indisputable fact. Both views are, in fact, opinion. The word bogus would only properly be used to describe something that has been absolutely proven to be false. - [[User:highbrow|highbrow]]
There are definitely problems with the term "bogus". The Reactions to Criticism section states the evolutionist argument against YEC as questionable the poses the YEC rebuttal as indisputable fact. Both views are, in fact, opinion. The word bogus would only properly be used to describe something that has been absolutely proven to be false. - [[User:highbrow|highbrow]]
: "absolutely" proven? How about proven beyond reasonable doubt? And how do you know that it hasn't been proven to be false? The evolutionist arguments ''are'' questionable, and I note that you have not disputed any of the YEC rebuttals. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:34, 21 October 2008 (EDT)