Changes

Baraminology (view source)

Revision as of 05:30, October 25, 2008

630 bytes removed , 05:30, October 25, 2008

Revert; baramins are not the same as species, and the edit was argumentative.

Line 50: Line 50:

Evolutionist scientists criticize Baraminology. These people claim Baraminology lacks rigorous testing and fails to produce any peer reviewed scientific research.{{fact}} It is regarded as pseudoscience by evolutionist scientists. However their claim has been rejected by creation scientists who described it as a young field still in development and stated that criticism can be resolved with further research<ref>[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/43/43_3/baraminology.htm The Current Status of Baraminology, Todd Charles Wood, CRSQ Vol 43 No 3, December 2006]</ref>.

−

~~== Baramins of plants ==~~

−

Botanists claim that different baramins (which they call species) of plants can hybridise with each other, like wheat with rye and raspberry with blackberry. This leads to two possible conclusions. Either, God created very few baramins of plants, e.g. each family of flowering plants is really something like a super-baramin, where most baramins (species) within the super-baramin (family) can hybridise with other baramins/species. Or botanists of an evolutionary tendency are systematically lying about cross-baramin / cross-species hybridisation. Creation scientists can reach their own conclusions.

==Further Information==

Philip J. Rayment

nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW

13,254

edits