Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cannibalism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reply) |
(yuk) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: No, because this not cannibalism.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:48, 11 December 2007 (EST) | : No, because this not cannibalism.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:48, 11 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Goodness, gracious. I think it was [[Robert Heinlein]] who called it symbolic cannibalism. Such a waste of a fertile mind: he "wore his imagination like a private suit of clothes" and influenced a generation, but he was stridently anti-religious. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:07, 4 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 00:07, November 5, 2008
Should we mention the symbolic cannibalism that is sometimes found in religions ("This is by body, this is my blood")? --Pibu 20:36, 11 December 2007 (EST)
- No, because this not cannibalism.--Aschlafly 20:48, 11 December 2007 (EST)
- Goodness, gracious. I think it was Robert Heinlein who called it symbolic cannibalism. Such a waste of a fertile mind: he "wore his imagination like a private suit of clothes" and influenced a generation, but he was stridently anti-religious. --Ed Poor Talk 19:07, 4 November 2008 (EST)