Difference between revisions of "Sudden Jihad Syndrome"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(removing slight bias. This entire article is racist and completely wrong, but considering the encyclopedia I'll just stick to fixing small errors.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{merge|Jihad}}
 
{{merge|Jihad}}
−
'''Sudden Jihad Syndrome''' is a term [[Daniel Pipes]] coined to describe [[Muslims]] that suddenly or unexpectedly turn against civilized, Western society and engage in acts of terror.<ref>"...a widespread pattern of Muslims who lead quiet lives before turning to terrorism" [http://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=29080]</ref> Pipes has argued that due to this phenomenon all [[Islamist]]s must be considered potential terrorists.<ref> "Individual [[Islamist]]s may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and as such, all must be considered potential killers." [http://www.city-journal.org/html/11_4_fighting_militant.html]</ref>
+
'''Sudden Jihad Syndrome''' is a term [[Daniel Pipes]] coined to describe [[Muslims]] that suddenly or unexpectedly turn against others and engage in acts of terror.<ref>"...a widespread pattern of Muslims who lead quiet lives before turning to terrorism" [http://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=29080]</ref> Pipes has argued that due to this phenomenon all [[Islamist]]s must be considered potential terrorists.<ref> "Individual [[Islamist]]s may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and as such, all must be considered potential killers." [http://www.city-journal.org/html/11_4_fighting_militant.html]</ref>
  
 
Examples include:
 
Examples include:

Revision as of 17:21, November 7, 2008

It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with [[::Jihad|Jihad]]. (Discuss)

Sudden Jihad Syndrome is a term Daniel Pipes coined to describe Muslims that suddenly or unexpectedly turn against others and engage in acts of terror.[1] Pipes has argued that due to this phenomenon all Islamists must be considered potential terrorists.[2]

Examples include:

In another Example of Bias in Wikipedia, Wikipedia has refused to allow any article on this topic,[10] [11] [12] and even refused to let an editor work on a draft for a rewrite of the article. [13] According to the editors of Wikipedia, the article contained too much original research and was not referenced well enough.

References