Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
113 bytes added ,  02:18, November 8, 2008
Line 14: Line 14:  
::: Race at least is superficial.  Why do you say that the quote is written by someone with a "fundamental misunderstanding of the fundamental forces"?  As for the cause of the breakthroughs, see [[Natural science#beginnings]]; it was a cause.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:58, 7 November 2008 (EST)
 
::: Race at least is superficial.  Why do you say that the quote is written by someone with a "fundamental misunderstanding of the fundamental forces"?  As for the cause of the breakthroughs, see [[Natural science#beginnings]]; it was a cause.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:58, 7 November 2008 (EST)
 
::::I mentioned that fundamental misunderstanding bit because the author of the article conveniently ignores the underlying principles of, say, hard drive-making. In his article he cites as a tenet of his hypothesis that a hard drive is no heavier when it is full than when it is empty, and therefore that it contains nothing in either state, and thus that information does not exist physically. In fact, hard drives are built on the principles of basic electronics, which incorporate the fundamental force called electromagnetic, in that electrons are moved through the hard drive and switching states of bistable multivibrators between 1 and 0. Electrons (actual particles with mass and energy), silicone and germanium and semiconductor junctions in general, governed by Boolean algebra is by no means outside of the physical world. The same goes for the great mini-supercomputer we call a brain. In light of this, his entire argument falls apart, because the presence of information is explained by processes well within the material realm, and the quote in the quotes section is obsolete and wrong.
 
::::I mentioned that fundamental misunderstanding bit because the author of the article conveniently ignores the underlying principles of, say, hard drive-making. In his article he cites as a tenet of his hypothesis that a hard drive is no heavier when it is full than when it is empty, and therefore that it contains nothing in either state, and thus that information does not exist physically. In fact, hard drives are built on the principles of basic electronics, which incorporate the fundamental force called electromagnetic, in that electrons are moved through the hard drive and switching states of bistable multivibrators between 1 and 0. Electrons (actual particles with mass and energy), silicone and germanium and semiconductor junctions in general, governed by Boolean algebra is by no means outside of the physical world. The same goes for the great mini-supercomputer we call a brain. In light of this, his entire argument falls apart, because the presence of information is explained by processes well within the material realm, and the quote in the quotes section is obsolete and wrong.
 +
::::In addition, I read the Natural Science article, and it really confused me. I see no logic in it whatsoever.
90

edits

Navigation menu