Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scientific Theory of Evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: This is part of the evolution/disambiguation page structure that a couple of admins and I created to deal with issues of bias on this site. A number of editors have signed on to this proj...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is part of the evolution/disambiguation page structure that a couple of admins and I created to deal with issues of bias on this site. A number of editors have signed on to this project constructively, including some previous objectors. I'd appreciate it if it didn't get blanked. Please express your support for this project below.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 20:14, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | This is part of the evolution/disambiguation page structure that a couple of admins and I created to deal with issues of bias on this site. A number of editors have signed on to this project constructively, including some previous objectors. I'd appreciate it if it didn't get blanked. Please express your support for this project below.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 20:14, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The compromise was talked about [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Creationism#Compromise:_Split_Articles|on the Creationism article] but has gained more support from other admins elsewhere. Would-be-blankers: please respect our group consensus and do not put your own opinion above that of a good number of admins and editors.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 20:17, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:17, March 22, 2007
This is part of the evolution/disambiguation page structure that a couple of admins and I created to deal with issues of bias on this site. A number of editors have signed on to this project constructively, including some previous objectors. I'd appreciate it if it didn't get blanked. Please express your support for this project below.-AmesG 20:14, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
The compromise was talked about the Creationism article but has gained more support from other admins elsewhere. Would-be-blankers: please respect our group consensus and do not put your own opinion above that of a good number of admins and editors.-AmesG 20:17, 21 March 2007 (EDT)