Difference between revisions of "Talk:Homosexuality obsession"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reply to HJ and CPAdmin)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
::::Tim, we may have several articles on homosexuality, but that's because we're exposing the liberals and the gay agenda. It's hardly our fault that they've aided the infiltration of homosexuality into the mainstream, but it's our duty to point out how this infiltration is occuring and the dangers of letting it proceed unchecked.
 
::::Tim, we may have several articles on homosexuality, but that's because we're exposing the liberals and the gay agenda. It's hardly our fault that they've aided the infiltration of homosexuality into the mainstream, but it's our duty to point out how this infiltration is occuring and the dangers of letting it proceed unchecked.
 
:::: HelpJazz, many of these points are taken up in the other articles. As my edit summary said when I created this article, it's more of a place to collect the general observations. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 21:28, 14 November 2008 (EST)
 
:::: HelpJazz, many of these points are taken up in the other articles. As my edit summary said when I created this article, it's more of a place to collect the general observations. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 21:28, 14 November 2008 (EST)
 +
:::::If that's true then we either don't need this article, or you can port over the references from those articles (assuming those articles have references...). [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 21:53, 14 November 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 02:53, November 15, 2008

Oh goodness. HelpJazz 19:15, 14 November 2008 (EST)

Goodness it is indeed. -Foxtrot 19:58, 14 November 2008 (EST)
What then, does that make this and this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CPAdmin1 (talk)
Depending on the article, more of the same, I'd say. HelpJazz 20:16, 14 November 2008 (EST)
Seriously, though. This article has no citations and has a LOT of statements which need them. HelpJazz 20:19, 14 November 2008 (EST)
Tim, we may have several articles on homosexuality, but that's because we're exposing the liberals and the gay agenda. It's hardly our fault that they've aided the infiltration of homosexuality into the mainstream, but it's our duty to point out how this infiltration is occuring and the dangers of letting it proceed unchecked.
HelpJazz, many of these points are taken up in the other articles. As my edit summary said when I created this article, it's more of a place to collect the general observations. -Foxtrot 21:28, 14 November 2008 (EST)
If that's true then we either don't need this article, or you can port over the references from those articles (assuming those articles have references...). HelpJazz 21:53, 14 November 2008 (EST)