Difference between revisions of "User talk:EternalCritic"
(downsizing the talk page) |
(→Cato: Make positive use of your energies) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::::That certainly rings a bell. I expect articles on both Catos would be beneficial here (though there is much else to do as well, of course).--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 11:11, 24 October 2008 (EDT) | ::::That certainly rings a bell. I expect articles on both Catos would be beneficial here (though there is much else to do as well, of course).--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 11:11, 24 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
::::: I'll see when I can fit it in. So far my abiliy to access my research notes is limited, so my entries are not up to snuff for me. | ::::: I'll see when I can fit it in. So far my abiliy to access my research notes is limited, so my entries are not up to snuff for me. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Obama== | ||
| + | Flinging around accusations of spuriousness isn't going to do you any good, EternalCritic, though I suppose we might have been warned by your name. Eternal criticism loses any value and amounts to nothing more than ill-motivated vandalism. Please turn your energies towards more constructive purposes. You could research the Obama thesis and find further ''supportive'' evidence, since your 'tests to destruction' have failed - or there are plenty of tasks needing a master in the News Project or wanted pages sections. A word to the wise, I hope... [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 07:11, 18 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 12:11, November 18, 2008
Cato
I wonder whether you'd be interested in creating a page on Cato? He's quite an important figure in the Divine Comedy, which is why I'm personally keen to have an entry for him, but I don't know much about him as a historical figure, whereas you seem to have some expertise in ancient history.--CPalmer 08:01, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
Also, nobody seems to have welcomed you yet, so welcome to Conservapedia!
- Thanks for the welcome, but which Cato was it? Cato the younder, or Cato the Younger as they were both very important historically in different ways.
- I'm afraid I'm not sure. I do know that the one I'm talking about committed suicide, if that narrows it down.--CPalmer 11:04, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
- That would definitely be Cato the Younger who killed himself after the defeat of his forces by Caesar during Caesar's removal of opposition to his rule.
- That certainly rings a bell. I expect articles on both Catos would be beneficial here (though there is much else to do as well, of course).--CPalmer 11:11, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
- I'll see when I can fit it in. So far my abiliy to access my research notes is limited, so my entries are not up to snuff for me.
- That certainly rings a bell. I expect articles on both Catos would be beneficial here (though there is much else to do as well, of course).--CPalmer 11:11, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
- That would definitely be Cato the Younger who killed himself after the defeat of his forces by Caesar during Caesar's removal of opposition to his rule.
- I'm afraid I'm not sure. I do know that the one I'm talking about committed suicide, if that narrows it down.--CPalmer 11:04, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
Obama
Flinging around accusations of spuriousness isn't going to do you any good, EternalCritic, though I suppose we might have been warned by your name. Eternal criticism loses any value and amounts to nothing more than ill-motivated vandalism. Please turn your energies towards more constructive purposes. You could research the Obama thesis and find further supportive evidence, since your 'tests to destruction' have failed - or there are plenty of tasks needing a master in the News Project or wanted pages sections. A word to the wise, I hope... Bugler 07:11, 18 November 2008 (EST)