Difference between revisions of "Talk:Homosexual deception"
(one thing at a time) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:: That still doesn't address the rest of the issues with his methodology and extremist (basically concentration camps) views. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 14:18, 19 November 2008 (EST) | :: That still doesn't address the rest of the issues with his methodology and extremist (basically concentration camps) views. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 14:18, 19 November 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm still waiting for you to acknowledge the error I just pointed out. Then we'll go on to the next point. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:26, 19 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 19:26, November 19, 2008
If anyone asks you about gay bashing, you can ask them, "Do you oppose all violence against homosexuals?" Then note whether they condone gay-on-gay violence. --Ed Poor Talk 13:10, 19 November 2008 (EST)
Paul Cameron
Paul Cameron is not respected in his field. I just read that the man got kicked out of the APA in the 1980's. Whether his work is fairly or unfairly being treated is immaterial to whether he is respected. I suggest reading http://www.asanet.org/footnotes/1987/ASA.01.1987.pdf#page=4 to decide whether the man is worthy of respect. I err towards not. He has advocated quarantine of homosexuals which in any interpretation is a violation of personal freedoms. If you want to use this guy as a source, its up to you, but really, this guy clearly has issues. EternalCritic 14:11, 19 November 2008 (EST)
- Wrong. They changed the "ethics rules" to require psychologists to endorse homosexuality. So he resigned, and they accepted his resignation. A year later, they "dropped" him. How can you drop someone who already quit? --Ed Poor Talk 14:14, 19 November 2008 (EST)
- That still doesn't address the rest of the issues with his methodology and extremist (basically concentration camps) views. EternalCritic 14:18, 19 November 2008 (EST)
I'm still waiting for you to acknowledge the error I just pointed out. Then we'll go on to the next point. --Ed Poor Talk 14:26, 19 November 2008 (EST)