Difference between revisions of "Debate:Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
HardRockFan (talk | contribs) (→No) |
m (cat) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==No== | ==No== | ||
I think it would be incorrect to say that homosexuality is a "mental illness", and even if it were, personal liberty should always be taken into account. I don't think that any homosexuals want to be "cured", and if they do, and someone could make a cure, then let the gays decide. If the cure is genetically engineered, then I would say definitely no, because [[Abortion|messing with fetuses]] is pretty controversial. | I think it would be incorrect to say that homosexuality is a "mental illness", and even if it were, personal liberty should always be taken into account. I don't think that any homosexuals want to be "cured", and if they do, and someone could make a cure, then let the gays decide. If the cure is genetically engineered, then I would say definitely no, because [[Abortion|messing with fetuses]] is pretty controversial. | ||
| + | [[Category:Conservapedia Debates]] | ||
Revision as of 22:11, November 20, 2008
No
I think it would be incorrect to say that homosexuality is a "mental illness", and even if it were, personal liberty should always be taken into account. I don't think that any homosexuals want to be "cured", and if they do, and someone could make a cure, then let the gays decide. If the cure is genetically engineered, then I would say definitely no, because messing with fetuses is pretty controversial.