Difference between revisions of "User talk:GeorgePhillips"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ==MJ== Some insight from Conservapedia's founder, Andy Schlafly: :"It's inherently unreliable and non-encyclopedic for a critic of a church to try to explain its doctrine. No encycloped...) |
(→MJ) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:"Anyone who has an ax to grind against a particular church (or group of church members) should not grind it here.--Aschlafly 17:15, 28 June 2008 (EDT)" | :"Anyone who has an ax to grind against a particular church (or group of church members) should not grind it here.--Aschlafly 17:15, 28 June 2008 (EDT)" | ||
Based on your current edits, I feel you are violating this counsel, and your edits will be reverted. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|שועל]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 20:02, 20 November 2008 (EST) | Based on your current edits, I feel you are violating this counsel, and your edits will be reverted. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|שועל]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 20:02, 20 November 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I did not cite a critic of a church for the comparison chart--[[User:GeorgePhillips|GeorgePhillips]] 20:03, 20 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 01:03, November 21, 2008
MJ
Some insight from Conservapedia's founder, Andy Schlafly:
- "It's inherently unreliable and non-encyclopedic for a critic of a church to try to explain its doctrine. No encyclopedia should allow such an absurdity.--Aschlafly 16:17, 28 June 2008 (EDT)"
- "Anyone who has an ax to grind against a particular church (or group of church members) should not grind it here.--Aschlafly 17:15, 28 June 2008 (EDT)"
Based on your current edits, I feel you are violating this counsel, and your edits will be reverted. 10px שועל (talk|contribs) 20:02, 20 November 2008 (EST)
I did not cite a critic of a church for the comparison chart--GeorgePhillips 20:03, 20 November 2008 (EST)