Difference between revisions of "Talk:William the Conqueror"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Coverage of Domesday Book.)
 
(categorization question)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
The DB didn't cover all of England. It excluded what is now Cumbria, which at the time was still part of the region of Strathclyde, part of the Kingdom of [[Scotland]]; and also both the Patrimony of St Cuthbert (better known as [[County Durham]]), where the bishopric produced its own 'Domesday', the Boldon Book, in the twelfth century, and [[Northumberland]], a quasi-autonomous earldom on an uncertain frontier.
 
The DB didn't cover all of England. It excluded what is now Cumbria, which at the time was still part of the region of Strathclyde, part of the Kingdom of [[Scotland]]; and also both the Patrimony of St Cuthbert (better known as [[County Durham]]), where the bishopric produced its own 'Domesday', the Boldon Book, in the twelfth century, and [[Northumberland]], a quasi-autonomous earldom on an uncertain frontier.
 +
 +
==Category==
 +
 +
Why UK history? Why not [[:Category:English History]]? There was no [[United Kingdom]] way back then, was there? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 07:59, 21 November 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 12:59, November 21, 2008

Domesday

The DB didn't cover all of England. It excluded what is now Cumbria, which at the time was still part of the region of Strathclyde, part of the Kingdom of Scotland; and also both the Patrimony of St Cuthbert (better known as County Durham), where the bishopric produced its own 'Domesday', the Boldon Book, in the twelfth century, and Northumberland, a quasi-autonomous earldom on an uncertain frontier.

Category

Why UK history? Why not Category:English History? There was no United Kingdom way back then, was there? --Ed Poor Talk 07:59, 21 November 2008 (EST)