Difference between revisions of "User talk:BabeTruth2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
BabeTruth2 (talk | contribs) (How is what I did any different than speculation on Obama's drug usage in high school, Gore's energy consumption, Clinton's affair? Please explain the difference, other than this fact embarrasses you.) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:: And how is an entire article speculating on Darwin's mental health any different? Or information on [[Barack Obama]]'s drug use? Or on [[Al Gore]]'s energy usage? I challenge you to explain the difference. --[[User:BabeTruth2|BabeTruth2]] 00:58, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | :: And how is an entire article speculating on Darwin's mental health any different? Or information on [[Barack Obama]]'s drug use? Or on [[Al Gore]]'s energy usage? I challenge you to explain the difference. --[[User:BabeTruth2|BabeTruth2]] 00:58, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::: Maybe it isn't any different. I haven't seen those articles, and any gossip there should be removed also. It's not an encyclopedia if it has gossip. It's the National Enquirer.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:04, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:04, March 22, 2007
Yes, you will be blocked again, because you are posting gossip inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Your posting is not educational in any way.--Aschlafly 00:54, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
P.S. Our rules are clear and violators are blocked.--Aschlafly 00:55, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- And how is an entire article speculating on Darwin's mental health any different? Or information on Barack Obama's drug use? Or on Al Gore's energy usage? I challenge you to explain the difference. --BabeTruth2 00:58, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- Maybe it isn't any different. I haven't seen those articles, and any gossip there should be removed also. It's not an encyclopedia if it has gossip. It's the National Enquirer.--Aschlafly 01:04, 22 March 2007 (EDT)