Difference between revisions of "Talk:Homosexual behavior in animals"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(another failure of liberal logic) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
All agree (with one notable exception) that incest is not justified by claims of "love". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:25, 25 November 2008 (EST) | All agree (with one notable exception) that incest is not justified by claims of "love". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:25, 25 November 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Should this article redirect to [[Homosexuality in Animals Myth]]? [[User:AlbertW|AlbertW]] 14:10, 25 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 19:10, November 25, 2008
The article I cited confuses companionship with mating. This reminds me of one of the most typical of "gay rights" arguments, which likewise confuses sex with affection or sex with friendship. "What's wrong with two men loving each other?" Nothing, of course, but what's wrong with a parent "loving" his child in the same way that a heterosexual couple love each other?
All agree (with one notable exception) that incest is not justified by claims of "love". --Ed Poor Talk 13:25, 25 November 2008 (EST)
- Should this article redirect to Homosexuality in Animals Myth? AlbertW 14:10, 25 November 2008 (EST)