Changes

755 bytes added ,  15:17, December 4, 2008
→‎Reversion of Ed Poor's edit: final reply to Philip re: gun control
Line 605: Line 605:  
:::::* Evidence that, in Australia, "99% of gun purchases and uses are[/were] for defensive purposes", because I'd be quite sure that was simply not true.
 
:::::* Evidence that, in Australia, "99% of gun purchases and uses are[/were] for defensive purposes", because I'd be quite sure that was simply not true.
 
::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:49, 3 December 2008 (EST)
 
::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:49, 3 December 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:::::: Philip, obviously it's a fool's errand to debate with anyone who has a closed mind, and I don't intend to do so.  Only 1 in 1000 Australians commit violent crimes.  A higher fraction, by orders of magnitude, have bought or used guns.  If you doubt m 99% estimate, then propose your own.  But don't insist on supporting gun control while not forming an estimate about that ratio.  That would be the ultimate in irrationality.
 +
 +
:::::: Virtually every conservative rejects gun control.  A majority of the U.S. Congress rejects it.  Australia has moved dramatically and predictably to the left since embracing gun control.  I suggest you reconsider the issue, but that's obviously up to you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:17, 4 December 2008 (EST)
    
== Gun control debate vs. greater emphasis on changing violent thinking of society ==
 
== Gun control debate vs. greater emphasis on changing violent thinking of society ==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,597

edits