Difference between revisions of "Opening fire"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(big difference between "opening" and "returning" fire)
(delete irrelevant section)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
In confrontations between US military forces and civilians, there are strict ethical and legal [[rules of engagement]] applied to the military. The question ''Who fired the first shot?'' has legal and ethical implications.
 
In confrontations between US military forces and civilians, there are strict ethical and legal [[rules of engagement]] applied to the military. The question ''Who fired the first shot?'' has legal and ethical implications.
  
==Open Fire==
 
Open fire! or simply Fire! is a command given to a squad of soldiers to commence firing their weapons.<ref>http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/open+fire</ref> This ensures that the maximum effectiveness is achieved and deters soldiers engaging at long ranges where their fire is less effective.
 
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==

Revision as of 14:20, December 8, 2008

Opening fire and Returning fire refers to the first shots fired in an engagement. It can be small arms fire or artillery. The side that "opens fire" is the first to shoot. This has ethical and often legal or political implications (see aggression, first strike). The side that returns fire does so in response to opening fire. The ethical and legal rules for returning fire are different (see self-defense).

In confrontations between US military forces and civilians, there are strict ethical and legal rules of engagement applied to the military. The question Who fired the first shot? has legal and ethical implications.


See also

External Links

References