Changes

Line 1,486: Line 1,486:  
The comment about Obama is wearing a flag lapel pin "for reasons that are likely political pandering" is completely speculative.  The phrase I quoted here should be removed unless we can find a citation reporting his reasons for wearing the pin.[[User:Bishop|Bishop]] 18:14, 9 December 2008 (EST)
 
The comment about Obama is wearing a flag lapel pin "for reasons that are likely political pandering" is completely speculative.  The phrase I quoted here should be removed unless we can find a citation reporting his reasons for wearing the pin.[[User:Bishop|Bishop]] 18:14, 9 December 2008 (EST)
 
: You should learn quickly that we do not stand for liberal censorship of facts at CP.  His pandering is an ongoing trend, not speculation. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 18:22, 9 December 2008 (EST)
 
: You should learn quickly that we do not stand for liberal censorship of facts at CP.  His pandering is an ongoing trend, not speculation. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 18:22, 9 December 2008 (EST)
 +
::Rod Weathers, with posts like that you might as well get used to parody accusations.  Your post was very clichéd - and the cliché was not applicable in any case – and did not actually respond to the objection.  The phrase in question most definitely ''is'' speculative, as it posits a motive that has not been disclosed, and actually uses the modifier “likely”.  Bishop quite rightly called for removing the speculation by either deleting the phrase or substantiating it.  “It’s true, but don’t say it” is censorship.  “If it’s true, back it up” is not.[[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 18:57, 9 December 2008 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha
195

edits