Difference between revisions of "Talk:Miranda v. Arizona"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(you're right) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Woah. "The total collapse of society"? That needs a citation desperately. Extraordinary statements require extraordinary support.- RReynald | Woah. "The total collapse of society"? That needs a citation desperately. Extraordinary statements require extraordinary support.- RReynald | ||
| − | |||
: You're right. So I took it out. I look forward to seeing more insights from you. Welcome.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 13:33, 13 December 2008 (EST) | : You're right. So I took it out. I look forward to seeing more insights from you. Welcome.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 13:33, 13 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::The previous version was too strong but I rephrased it to get the point across. As a conservative, I see legitimate reasons to worry about Miranda, but I wouldn't call it a total societal collapse!-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 13:36, 13 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 18:36, December 13, 2008
Woah. "The total collapse of society"? That needs a citation desperately. Extraordinary statements require extraordinary support.- RReynald
- You're right. So I took it out. I look forward to seeing more insights from you. Welcome.--aschlafly 13:33, 13 December 2008 (EST)
- The previous version was too strong but I rephrased it to get the point across. As a conservative, I see legitimate reasons to worry about Miranda, but I wouldn't call it a total societal collapse!-AlexanderM 13:36, 13 December 2008 (EST)