Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atheism and beliefs"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:That's a rarely held view (I think), but it may merit inclusion if common. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 16:52, 7 January 2009 (EST)
 
:That's a rarely held view (I think), but it may merit inclusion if common. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 16:52, 7 January 2009 (EST)
 
::So is limited speech, but panspermia is still a view held by some atheists.  [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 16:54, 7 January 2009 (EST)
 
::So is limited speech, but panspermia is still a view held by some atheists.  [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 16:54, 7 January 2009 (EST)
 +
Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought weak atheists denied they had a belief system and strong atheists acknowledge they hold beliefs.  I don't want to change anything without being sure.  Can anyone clarify?

Revision as of 22:35, January 7, 2009

I'm not touching this, though I do think panspermia needs to be added under Origins of Life. Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 16:30, 7 January 2009 (EST)

That's a rarely held view (I think), but it may merit inclusion if common. - Rod Weathers 16:52, 7 January 2009 (EST)
So is limited speech, but panspermia is still a view held by some atheists. Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 16:54, 7 January 2009 (EST)

Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought weak atheists denied they had a belief system and strong atheists acknowledge they hold beliefs. I don't want to change anything without being sure. Can anyone clarify?